Embedded Files
How Contractors Were Assessed
How Contractors Were Assessed
Each roofing vendor was evaluated using a weighted scoring model designed to balance cost efficiency, long‑term protection, reliability, and clarity of scope.
Comparing the Materials Behind the Top Two Bids
Comparing the Materials Behind the Top Two Bids
To deepen this review, the scoring model was further expanded for the top two bidders to compare the material quality, manufacturing controls, and supplier reliability behind each product. This allowed the Board to evaluate not only the roofing contractors, but also the strength and consistency of the steel suppliers they rely on.
Side by Side Comparison of Metal Suppliers
Side by Side Comparison of Metal Suppliers
Rather than relying on sales claims, the Board reviewed the actual steel products behind each proposal—examining coating systems, corrosion protection, material grade, and long‑term performance. This ensured the final decision was based on objective product quality, not marketing narratives.
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse